Speaking of atheists (http://project05952381.blogspot.com/2010/05/being-geek-and-christian.html), two of my childhood friends -- atheists, hardcore skeptical, scientists in their own right with doctorates and such -- do have some valid points to their reasoning from a scientific point of view, which make me think and look for a religious/scientific answer their claims. It's the never ending quarrel (two against one) between friends, which we often avoid. Nonetheless I want to win the battle and prove them that there's a Godhead and make them worship God in whatever way (religion) they see fit.
Needless to say, most of my friends believe in God following different religious beliefs -- not only Christian.
In all this might be why I like reading Friedrich Nietzsche ("Gott ist tot"). His material always make me more interested in Christianity as well as forcing me to analyze my religious beliefs against my understanding of science.
Showing posts with label bad science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bad science. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
bad science vs bad theology
I found two articles this morning in Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/science) regarding science and God. It mentions intelligent design theory intertwining creationism (God) with evolution (Darwinism).
The question: Is intelligent design bad theology?
The question: Is intelligent design bad theology?
"Intelligent design theory (ID), the latest version of scientific creationism to challenge the Darwinian orthodoxy in biology, is in the unenviable position of being damned as both bad science and bad theology. However, if those charges are true, then the basis of our belief in both science and God may be irrational. At the very least, ID suggests that belief in the two may be interdependent."http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/may/03/science-religion-intelligent-design
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)